Author Topic: The Rate Debate  (Read 690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lucy Lass-Tick

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1532
  • Karma: +82/-4
The Rate Debate
« on: February 13, 2019, 12: PM »
« Last Edit: February 13, 2019, 01: PM by Lucy Lass-Tick »

Inspector Knacker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3969
  • Karma: +301/-17
  • Newbie
Re: The Rate Debate
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2019, 12: PM »
It certainly makes you wonder what criteria was used to justify these two payments.

Stig of the Seaton Dump

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
  • Karma: +66/-0
  • Unexploded
Re: The Rate Debate
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2019, 01: PM »
PD Ports, the same people getting rid of the fishermen's huts ?
I don't believe it.

fred c

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3693
  • Karma: +394/-754
  • DOH
Re: The Rate Debate
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2019, 02: PM »
Helping smaller businesses, errrrrr how does that actually work then who decides who gets what when they are dishing out the money........having said that, a local business ended up 358,000 quid in rate relief....Well technically it wasn't rate relief, it just didn't pay the rates bill.

jawsbbc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • Karma: +22/-3
Re: The Rate Debate
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2019, 12: PM »
Helping smaller businesses, errrrrr how does that actually work then who decides who gets what when they are dishing out the money........having said that, a local business ended up 358,000 quid in rate relief....Well technically it wasn't rate relief, it just didn't pay the rates bill.
LEST WE FORGET



https://www.hartlepoolmail.co.uk/news/hartlepool-council-writes-off-eye-watering-500-000-business-tax-debts-1-8591720