jacksons landing

Started by jawsbbc, September 20, 2018, 10: AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jawsbbc

knock it down then build it back up


Application Details
This page shows the details on the current application being viewed and allows you to make comments on the proposal where the decision is shown to be pending.

If you wish to enter a new search use the Planning Application Search
or use the left hand menu

Application details
Reference number   H/2018/0348   Application Type   Full - Major application

Proposed Development
Provision of an area of public realm incorporating hard and soft landscaping, lighting and street furniture including demolition and relocation of electrical substation
Site Address   THE WATERFRONT
JACKSONS LANDING
THE HIGHLIGHT
HARTLEPOOL
TS24 0XN   Valid Date   22/08/2018
Received Date   22/08/2018   Target Date   21/11/2018
Decision   PENDING   Decision Date
Decision Key   APP = Approved
REF = Refused
Agent Details   MR STEVE WILKIE
HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL
BUILDING CONSULTANCY
CIVIC CENTRE
HARTLEPOOL
TS25 8AY
Applicant Name   HARTLEPOOL BOROUGH COUNCIL
Case Officer   Jane Tindall   Case Officer Telephone   01429 523284

If you would like to send comments on this application, please click on the comments button.
Please Note that comments made will be available for the public to see.
To be certain that your comments will be taken into account, you should reply within 21
days of the valid date shown. However, you can contact the case officer to see if later
comments can be accepted      .http://eforms.hartlepool.gov.uk:7777/portal/servlets/MajorContentiousDevelopmentservlet

Inspector Knacker

Noticed the planning application for 189 homes on Oakesway Trading Estate and another 500 at Middle Warren.
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

diSme

Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 20, 2018, 01: PM
Noticed the planning application for 189 homes on Oakesway Trading Estate and another 500 at Middle Warren.

Urban sprawl is apparently a lucrative business for 'the few'.

I believe everything and nothing

Inspector Knacker

In my gormless naivety, I thought Oakesway was for light industry. Unlike other places,  who prepare starter units to meet the needs of business, we seem to excel in stagnation and apathy.
The town is turning into a huge housing estate, a feeder town with developments elsewhere.
Is that our role in the Tees Valley as the start of the £55 m manufacturing base in Middlesbrough began today. We get some new pavements we didn't need, they get the jobs of consequence.
Suckered again.
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

UnknownUser

The total amount spent on the redevelopment of the Waterfront site to date
is £107,777.24.

This includes the Waterfront masterplan, tourism study, public realm
design fees, site investigations and consultancy support

£70,890 has been funded by Hartlepool Borough Council and £36,887.24 from
the Tees Valley Combined Authority.
When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.

Ayn Rand

Inspector Knacker

Quote from: UnknownUser on September 22, 2018, 03: PM


£70,890 has been funded by Hartlepool Borough Council and £36,887.24 from
the Tees Valley Combined Authority.
Where'd they find the money, been looking down the back of the settee?  The 'Paupers' are constantly whining they have nowt, such a puzzle. :o
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

fred c

All they are doing with 'The Waterfront' is spending around £1.4 million pounds of public money tarting up a big concrete pad to try and attract a developer....

I can't help but think what a bunch of tw**s they would look if someone came along and purchased the whole site the week after they spend the £1.4 million on it, deep down even the SCABAL don't think they are going to be able to flog it on... ::) ::) ::)

UnknownUser

Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 22, 2018, 03: PM
Quote from: UnknownUser on September 22, 2018, 03: PM


£70,890 has been funded by Hartlepool Borough Council and £36,887.24 from
the Tees Valley Combined Authority.
Where'd they find the money, been looking down the back of the settee?  The 'Paupers' are constantly whining they have nowt, such a puzzle. :o


That's before a shovel has even touched the ground...
When the law no longer protects you from the corrupt, but protects the corrupt from you, you know your nation is doomed.

Ayn Rand

Inspector Knacker

I've had a really stupid idea. Why not let the mysterious prospective developer spend the money on tarting it up? The money can then be left in the giant whiskey jar with the word 'vision' on a label stuck on it?
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

Lucy Lass-Tick

Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 22, 2018, 08: PM
I've had a really stupid idea. Why not let the mysterious prospective developer spend the money on tarting it up? The money can then be left in the giant whiskey jar with the word 'vision' on a label stuck on it?

Had the contents of the whisky bottle been imbibed? If so, could that have inspired the 'visions' ... double visions?

Inspector Knacker

Quote from: Lucy Lass-Tick on September 22, 2018, 08: PM
Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 22, 2018, 08: PM
I've had a really stupid idea. Why not let the mysterious prospective developer spend the money on tarting it up? The money can then be left in the giant whiskey jar with the word 'vision' on a label stuck on it?

Had the contents of the whisky bottle been imbibed? If so, could that have inspired the 'visions' ... double visions?
Some of the 'visions' could only be the result of imbibing screen wash.
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

Lucy Lass-Tick

Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 22, 2018, 09: PM
Quote from: Lucy Lass-Tick on September 22, 2018, 08: PM
Quote from: Inspector Knacker on September 22, 2018, 08: PM
I've had a really stupid idea. Why not let the mysterious prospective developer spend the money on tarting it up? The money can then be left in the giant whiskey jar with the word 'vision' on a label stuck on it?

Had the contents of the whisky bottle been imbibed? If so, could that have inspired the 'visions' ... double visions?
Some of the 'visions' could only be the result of imbibing screen wash.

What vintage?

Inspector Knacker

In the 'Whine' Producers guide, it's referred to as 'Shat Oh (dear)' Egotistique 18. A cheeky non sparkling cocktail that's hard to swallow and that leaves a bitter aftertaste. Expensive to keep and can be temperamental if exposed to unsuitable conditions. Ideally used to remove flies from any windscreen but can be very corrosive if not immediately removed from anything or anyone it comes into contact with.
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

Land Phil

Farmers market cancelled because of the weather.
If only there was a large empty building for such occasions.

fred c

That's what get get with a forward thinking council......Well Raymondo's "Quick Flip" has finally happened..........Just not the "Bin Tin Shed" Quick Flip.