Labour Seek control over Contracts

Started by steveL, June 30, 2016, 02: PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

steveL

Diplomacy is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.

Land Phil


steveL

If the idea is given wings then it will have to go before full council before being implemented - that should be fun.


As for the legality, that will be determined by Devlin and a quick calculation of his current pension entitlement.
Diplomacy is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.

Inspector Knacker

Veto contracts?  Based on what criteria?
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

kevplumb

Quote from: Riddler5 on June 30, 2016, 06: PM
Veto contracts?  Based on what criteria?

you really need to ask ???
A councillor is an elected representative of their ward, not their political party!
Councils need communities but communities don't need councils
Party politics have no place in local goverment

Inspector Knacker

What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

Lord Elpus

the criteria used will be what's in the self interest of a hand full of so called Council leaders.

Hartlepool deserves better.

fred c

Manor Residents & WhoCaresN/E....... public money & charity/voluntary outfits that didn't end well for the council tax payers.

The thought of the ruling group having control of awarding council contracts is something that doesn't bear thinking about, who exactly will provide the checks & balances, the LabTor Mob already run rings around the administration... look no further than the "Constant Improvement to the Constitution"  ;) ;) ;)