Am I the only one who noticed this.
Oct 20 2012 (http://img39.imageshack.us/i/maildupb.jpg/)
Nov 17 2012 (http://img210.imageshack.us/i/maildup.jpg/)
A 4 week recycle time is exceptional even for the Mail!
I could give you half a dozen such examples from recent memory but two will do:
October 2010 (http://img525.imageshack.us/i/maildupd.jpg/)
November 2012 (http://img845.imageshack.us/i/maildipc.jpg/)
This one so good they used it thrice............
(http://img341.imageshack.us/i/ladysmithbramley.jpg/)
and not once did they get the location correct. The photographer is standing on the right hand side (west) of Ladysmith st. (still there today) and the street to the left is Bramley st (long gone).
The same photos keep getting recycled as the compiler gets ever more desperate in an effort to generate feedback.
Lately the object seems to be to cram as many small murky photos as possible on the centre pages. The quality is so bad that they need not have bothered.
It's not unusual for the same article to appear twice in the same edition of the Mail on different pages so for photographs to reappear is to real surprise to me.