YOUSUF KHAN IS HE BROUGHT IN BY CRANNEY TO SPLIT SEATON,S VOTES

Started by jawsbbc, April 17, 2018, 05: PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jawsbbc

 https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07729682/officers



http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?subid=0&regid=519172                                                                           
                                                                                                                     
                https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/aa-00443-2011-ors                       The first appellant explained that he had moved away in social terms from the Pakistani community in the North East of England and had moved towards a greater involvement with the wider community. He had been involved in voluntary work (including work for the Mayor's Charity in Hartlepool) and had also become involved in politics (he has been a member of the Labour Party for the last two years and has been encouraged to believe that he could stand for election as a local councillor, if his immigration status were to be regularised). The second appellant has also been involved in charity work and has used her skills as a qualified accountant to help local organisations. 

fred c

Cranneys Sacrificial Lamb more like.......some interesting information in the links in the post above. ::)

jawsbbc

Quote from: jawsbbc on April 17, 2018, 05: PM
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/07729682/officers



http://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?subid=0&regid=519172                                                                           
                                                                                                                     
                https://tribunalsdecisions.service.gov.uk/utiac/aa-00443-2011-ors                       The first appellant explained that he had moved away in social terms from the Pakistani community in the North East of England and had moved towards a greater involvement with the wider community. He had been involved in voluntary work (including work for the Mayor's Charity in Hartlepool) and had also become involved in politics (he has been a member of the Labour Party for the last two years and has been encouraged to believe that he could stand for election as a local councillor, if his immigration status were to be regularised). The second appellant has also been involved in charity work and has used her skills as a qualified accountant to help local organisations.  DID NOT MEAN TO PUT " SPLIT THE VOTES"   IT SHOULD HAVE SAID "KHAN BROUGHT IN BY CRANNEY FOR LABOUR VOTES IN SEATON"

jawsbbc

Quote from: fred c on April 17, 2018, 07: PM
Cranneys Sacrificial Lamb more like.......some interesting information in the links in the post above. ::)
EXACTLY RIGHT FRED and yes very interesting info indeed

jawsbbc

cranney even giving loans out  to ofca ??   page 12 http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Accounts/Ends72/0000519172_AC_20160331_E_C.PDF
Owton Fens Community Association
Notes to financial statements
for the year ended 31 March 2016
Page 12
12. Related party transactions
Included in other creditors is a loan of £11,000 repayable to Cllr K Cranney, an advisor to the charity. The terms
of the loan, is that the charity can repay as and when funds become available.

Johnny Bongo

So what is the present immigration status of the above?  Are they still under threat of deportation?  Or have I missed something?

The first and second appellants came to the United Kingdom as students and I find that they can have had no justifiable expectation of being allowed to remain here indefinitely. They have advanced an asylum claim which has been found to be false. I find that the public interest concerned with the removal of such individuals in the furtherance of immigration control is a strong one. In my opinion, that interest outweighs any inconvenience and disruption which would be caused to the private lives of these appellants as a consequence of their return to Pakistan. Their family life may suffer some dislocation but they will, of course, be removed together. The Article 8 ECHR appeals are dismissed accordingly.
DECISION
These appeals are dismissed.
Signed   Date 1 September 2013
Upper Tribunal Judge Clive Lane

Are they now classed as British Citizens?  If so, how did this happen if their appeals were dismissed?  On the other side of this, I'd say that if immigrants in this country are here for a good length of time; in this case it seems, to the present time, approx 20 years, then surely, they have at least, a moral right to stay here, providing they are contributing to society, whatever their political beliefs!