Tory Hypocrisy

[steveL]

"Yet here people are... arguing over a signature. "

Signatures by definition are meant to be unique to an individual. (Thank God King John didn't use a 'stock font' to sign Magna Carta) and if there was no intent to deceive then why use a different font for Ms Loynes?

In a way it sums up things nicely - nothing is genuine about the local Tories - they may as well have asked C A-B to sign the bloody thing anyway.

""Councillor Lilley was at pains to stress that all members of Putting Hartlepool First were keen and willing to work with any group inside or outside the council that would lead to a better deal for Hartlepool residents. " For those members of PHF who didn't get the memo!"

This will become possible when Mr Wells crosses the floor and sits were he really belongs.

[Julie noted]

I got the impression Shane meant that the signatures were from a database of councillors signatures, to be appended where necessary, with owners permission.

That said, perusing the handwriting on George Morriss's his 'members register' forms, I can hardly believe he could sign a document in such a flowing style!!! 

Another thing; Why have all of the signatures on the members register forms been redacted? 

[mk1]

Another thing; Why have all of the signatures on the members register forms been redacted? 

So that no one can check up when one  the ruling cabal  are signing  for the sheep......................

[SRMoore]

""Councillor Lilley was at pains to stress that all members of Putting Hartlepool First were keen and willing to work with any group inside or outside the council that would lead to a better deal for Hartlepool residents. " For those members of PHF who didn't get the memo!"

This will become possible when Mr Wells crosses the floor and sits were he really belongs.
[/quote]

I always thought you were a better man than to put personal vendettas before the best interests of Hartlepool Steve. I guess in this regard it is I who is putting Hartlepool first.

[mk1]

As a totaly unbiased observer I feel I can comment.

The Labour group is run by, and for, the benefit of 4 people at the top.
The Tory 'group'  is a being used as a platform to showcase Wells and Wells  alone.

Ray knows he has no power  and the only way he can deliver  deals for his mates is to get into bed with Labour.
He has sold your party for his own self interest and anyone who tries to say otherwise must be blind.
There is no Tory Party only a Wells promotion society.

So Shane are you going to ape  the Labour sheep and come back to defend this myopia?

[steveL]

Shane, you need to look closer to home to discover what lengths people will go to on their personal vendettas.

[SRMoore]

You are completely missing the point Steve. Perseus and I are clear in stating that if you want to change something you can either continue slagging each other off on an internet forum or work together for the common good. Unfortunately you prefer to choose the former.

[steveL]

That's assuming the internet forum isn't under a DDOS attack at the time, I presume

[steveL]

The 5 PHF Councillors think for themselves and individually vote the way they believe is right - they don't need me to guide them.
The Labour Councillors vote the way they are told under threat of repercussions.
The 3 Tory Councillors do as Ray says (after he has consulted the CABAL) and confine their internal arguments to the corridors where he can be seen pointing a lot.

"plus a lot of the next generation of political leaders in this town via 'conservative future'."

In your dreams, baby

[SRMoore]

Haha I've often found that younger people grow out of socialism once they start paying taxes
But you're absolutely correct Perseus, division amongst the opposition will keep Labour in power for the forseeable future.