Proposed Travellers Sites

Started by steveL, May 19, 2013, 11: AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Inspector Knacker

Can anyone tell me of one of these so called consultations where the body in question conceded the public where right and they'd now  bow to public pressure....? ....... I can't.
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

beanzontoast

Greetings ALL, I have mentioned on this site before, and again now, the watchword is be careful who you vote for
I have been to several meetings RE. gypsy sites and not many people seem to be keen on the project. I take devils advocate on this, ie. it`s a voters choice ( for now )
Again I have mentioned how deep the rabbit hole goes, consider if you will Dan Brown ( author ) main thrust of the argument, ( symbolism ). Lets go then the Labour gov.com under tony blair for 13 years was a socialist government, they needed votes from the people to keep them in power, John Prescott ( Labour Mass Immigration ) designated Gypsies/Travellers as an oppressed peoples and so created the law we have now that law was designed to and only too give votes to a grateful people who in turn would vote for them ( Labour ) Hartlepool council is Labour. Wake up Hartlepool stop nazel gazing don`t vote for Bananas you get monkey`s. 

beanzontoast

Come on Lady`s and Gents here come`s that Monkey again. Hartlepool first will save you.