The Nuclear Option?

Started by Lucy Lass-Tick, October 01, 2019, 08: PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.


kevplumb

they have tryed this before  :o
A councillor is an elected representative of their ward, not their political party!
Councils need communities but communities don't need councils
Party politics have no place in local goverment

Land Phil

Over my dead body.


Why is everything a fight in Hartlepool, in particular the Seaton Carew side ?

With waste incinerators, landfill, biomass nuclear power, rotten ships, wind turbines, sewerage plants, stinking food plants, etc.

Combined with politicians with no balls.

Can't people look after their own filth instead of shipping it up and down the country to us ?

Lucy Lass-Tick

This falls within Stockton Council's fiefdom ... still worth watching, though.

Inspector Knacker

Quote from: Lucy Lass-Tick on October 01, 2019, 09: PM
This falls within Stockton Council's fiefdom ... still worth watching, though.
However the prevailing wind is from the south west so we'll be in direct line for their radioactive windfall. When is this area going to move on from being happy to accept everyone else's problems ?
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

Inspector Knacker

Listening to Ben Houchen on the radio and he didn't sound happy. Apparently the applicant already has a site at Port Clarence where it stores it, when did permission for this happen?
What can be asserted without proof,
can be dismissed without proof.

mk1

Quote from: Inspector Knacker on October 15, 2019, 07: PM
Listening to Ben Houchen on the radio and he didn't sound happy. Apparently the applicant already has a site at Port Clarence where it stores it, when did permission for this happen?
I am sure that despite all the public denials  local politicians of all parties would not be too upset if it became a done-deal. As long as they avoid a direct linking  they will not protest too much.