HartlepoolPost Forum

Politics => Local Issues and Matters => Topic started by: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 12: PM

Title: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 12: PM
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/councillors-set-boycott-meeting-amid-12435486#rlabs=5%20rt$sitewide%20p$3

pity our lot don't do something
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: akarjl on January 11, 2017, 01: PM
Biting the hand that feeds etc.....will never happen- most of the clowncillers are completely gutless.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 11, 2017, 01: PM
Quote from: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 12: PM
pity our lot don't do something

This is in effect the UKIP tactic. Say nowt do nowt  because that way you can be all things to all men. It is only by turning up and forcing the cabbages to get on their feet and explain themselves that we can  see how dumb they are.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 11, 2017, 03: PM
The labour group would be delighted if myself and others boycotted the meeting. We routinely have questions, motions etc rejected on frivolous grounds. As do members of the public with their questions being rejected.

We have far more sophisticated tactics than boycotting the meetings.

As I've said before, Labours attempts to silence the likes of myself and Paul are very easy to circumnavigate.

Take for example labours pitiful attempt to limit contributions to debate to 3 minutes.

I'm pretty sure I 'debated' the MRA issue for 12 minutes plus MYSELF last month. . . Labours front bench in Hartlepool aren't very clever. Whatever they try to do the stifle the opposition is easily tackled.

Assuming a person of course has the will to tackle it.


Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 04: PM
I didn't necessarily mean a boycott  just some show of unrest if you like
and not just the opposition I meant the performing seals as well
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 11, 2017, 05: PM
I'm not sure the 'performing seals' have the will. UKIPs tactic seems to be to sit tight and do nothing in the hope the public continue to vote for them.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 07: PM
Ahh the theory that if you do nothing you can't do nothing wrong  >:(
stinks
but then so does a lot of what goes on in this town
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: beanzontoast on January 11, 2017, 10: PM
Don`t put the blame on UKIP councillors, we are dumbfounded that you keep voting for Labour in Hartlepool, you didn`t care then that your fishing industry went down the pan and fishing boats had to be scrapped with thousands out of work across the country,fishing family`s ruined. You embraced unlimited migration, You embrace unlimited welfare, You embraced 24 hour drinking which has devastated families, and individuals alike, even the Labour biased church said don`t do this madness, you embraced crack cocaine gambling machines, all introduced by Tony Blair and new Labour, The lies he told to the British people over weapons of mass distruction, Labour`s love in with the Asian voter culminating with the Rotherham Asian rape gangs, and sadly you still don`t get it, i will say it again as i have said before in the council chamber, Labour will not take responsibility for anything.
Hartlepool`s chosen champion Mr. Corbyn still cant make up his mind on immigration, well he can`t he would then have to admit  have to admit Labour were wrong and that they couldn`t do. Responsibility you see.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: beanzontoast on January 11, 2017, 10: PM
Well David you can always spout a lot of hot air,in the chamber looks good sounds good but what have you achieved, i remember you and your comrades, wished to remove one SAB as Mayor, not once, not twice, but three times, what happened well nothing really a firework that didn`t go off. your latest outburst re let me get this correct you alluded to councillors in the chamber as corrupt and physcologicaly flawed, you even made derogatory comments on Christopher and Stephens wedding on this very forum. What was your derogatory comment the colour of their trousers and this forum lapped it up. and after what i heard in a meeting today don`t you ever get on your moral high ground with me.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 11, 2017, 11: PM
Quote from: beanzontoastWell David you can always spout a lot of hot air in the chamber looks good sounds good but what have you achieved, i remember you and your comrades, wished to remove one SAB as Mayor, not once, not twice, but three times, what happened well nothing really a firework that didn`t go off.

why didn't you back him up then?
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 12, 2017, 06: AM
The attempts to get shot of SAB made local and national headlines. In any other 'normal' authority he would have resigned or been made to by his national party. But not in Hartlepool.

I'm not even going to waste time commenting on your semi-racist ramble about Muslims. It's beneath contempt.

As for CAB he wouldn't BE a councillor today if YOU had gotten your act together and sorted out Darren Prices postal votes properly.

YOU, Tom Hind were given that responsibility right? Did you even get the postal vote letter out?

As for you reference to something you were told in a meeting about me, I've had to fend off rumours and/or ignore them since I was elected. Some of them absolutely vile.

Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 12, 2017, 07: AM
Quote from: beanzontoast on January 11, 2017, 10: PM
Don`t put the blame on UKIP councillors, we are dumbfounded that you keep voting for Labour in Hartlepool, you didn`t care then that your fishing industry went down the pan and fishing boats had to be scrapped with thousands out of work across the country,fishing family`s ruined. You embraced unlimited migration, You embrace unlimited welfare, You embraced 24 hour drinking which has devastated families, and individuals alike, even the Labour biased church said don`t do this madness, you embraced crack cocaine gambling machines, all introduced by Tony Blair and new Labour, The lies he told to the British people over weapons of mass distruction, Labour`s love in with the Asian voter culminating with the Rotherham Asian rape gangs, and sadly you still don`t get it, i will say it again as i have said before in the council chamber, Labour will not take responsibility for anything.
Hartlepool`s chosen champion Mr. Corbyn still cant make up his mind on immigration, well he can`t he would then have to admit  have to admit Labour were wrong and that they couldn`t do. Responsibility you see.

Proof positive Tom is a bong-eyed fruitcake-looney immigration obsessed individual who believes there are 'Reds' under the flowerbeds in his garden.

Tom is at about the level of this deluded m**r*n:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYd9qbRz2fc
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 12, 2017, 07: AM
Quote from: beanzontoast on January 11, 2017, 10: PM
What was your derogatory comment the colour of their trousers and this forum lapped it up. and after what i heard in a meeting today don`t you ever get on your moral high ground with me.

'Sh*it brown' I believe the term was. Thanks for confirming you are a  preputial sphincter.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 12, 2017, 08: AM
My comment referenced Boyzone and Montgomery I think. Not poo.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: Lord Elpus on January 12, 2017, 08: AM
Quote from: beanzontoast on January 11, 2017, 10: PM
Well David you can always spout a lot of hot air,in the chamber looks good sounds good but what have you achieved, i remember you and your comrades, wished to remove one SAB as Mayor, not once, not twice, but three times, what happened well nothing really a firework that didn`t go off. your latest outburst re let me get this correct you alluded to councillors in the chamber as corrupt and physcologicaly flawed, you even made derogatory comments on Christopher and Stephens wedding on this very forum. What was your derogatory comment the colour of their trousers and this forum lapped it up. and after what i heard in a meeting today don`t you ever get on your moral high ground with me.

Tom, are you pished when you write this tripe?
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: Lord Elpus on January 12, 2017, 08: AM
Quote from: DRiddle on January 12, 2017, 08: AM
My comment referenced Boyzone and Montgomery I think. Not poo.

I believe I can lay claim to having described thier suits as being diarrhoea brown colour, I even posted a pic of a real turd for comparison
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 12, 2017, 09: AM
Quote from: Lord Elpus on January 12, 2017, 08: AM
I even posted a pic of a real turd for comparison

I thought the turd was wearing the suit?
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 12, 2017, 02: PM
Quoteyou alluded to councillors in the chamber as corrupt and physcologicaly flawed

Tom, you know that's not true. I spoke about the psychological characteristics of people who commit fraud, not councillors.
If you opted to infer that I was speaking about Labour councillors then that's up to you. Personally I'd be a bit wary of throwing slanderous accusations around on here.

All my points can be referenced and attributed to some of the leading psychologists in the world and their views on people who commit fraud.

and as we know, people who commit fraud are not necessarily councillors.

(Except for Wilcox of course, who WAS a councillor and who WAS committing fraud.

Anyway, i'll leave you to mutter into your pint about Muslims.

P.S There are 3 'L's in 'psychologically.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: fred c on January 12, 2017, 02: PM
I have to admit that after almost 40 years of construction site craic, I can't claim to be a shrinking violet....... but, after reading the last 2 or 3 post ::)s by BeanzonTom, I have to admit to feeling embarrasses for the fella, Alan Touring would have had difficulty in decyphering some of the gobbledegook he has spouted recently........... Tom, I am trying not to be overly critical, but seriously, think long & hard about what you want post, before you post it.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: DRiddle on January 12, 2017, 06: PM
QuoteLabour`s love in with the Asian voter culminating with the Rotherham Asian rape gangs

Tom Hind, UKIP councillor for Seaton (A.K.A Beanzontoast). Could you please elaborate on what you meant by the quote you made above please? 
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: Steely Dan on January 12, 2017, 07: PM
David, asking him to to explain what he meant has two insurmountable issues. Firstly it's very doubtful he knows what he meant and secondly any explanation he gives will be impossible to understand.

As I've said before, it's embarrassing and depressing that this fella is a civic leader of our town. And that's without even going into his political views
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 12, 2017, 07: PM
Quote from: Steely DanDavid, asking him to to explain what he meant has two insurmountable issues. Firstly it's very doubtful he knows what he meant and secondly any explanation he gives will be impossible to understand.

come on S D I asked him a straight forward question and he didn't answer
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 13, 2017, 02: PM
The UKIP bandwagon was derailed in Sunderland. Seems like The Libs are hoovering up disaffected Labour votes.

http://www.sunderlandecho.com/news/environment/lib-dems-take-seat-in-sunderland-s-sandhill-ward-by-election-1-8332436


Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 13, 2017, 03: PM
Quote from: Steely Dan on January 12, 2017, 07: PM
David, asking him to to explain what he meant has two insurmountable issues. Firstly it's very doubtful he knows what he meant and secondly any explanation he gives will be impossible to understand.

As I've said before, it's embarrassing and depressing that this fella is a civic leader of our town. And that's without even going into his political views

Didn't he say he was in charge of writing UKIPs 'manifesto' for Hartlepool a few posts back?
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: kevplumb on January 13, 2017, 03: PM
Quote from: mk1Didn't he say he was in charge of writing UKIPs 'manifesto' for Hartlepool a few posts back?

says it all really::)
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: jeffh on January 13, 2017, 04: PM
Quote from: mk1 on January 13, 2017, 03: PM
Quote from: Steely Dan on January 12, 2017, 07: PM
David, asking him to to explain what he meant has two insurmountable issues. Firstly it's very doubtful he knows what he meant and secondly any explanation he gives will be impossible to understand.

As I've said before, it's embarrassing and depressing that this fella is a civic leader of our town. And that's without even going into his political views

Didn't he say he was in charge of writing UKIPs 'manifesto' for Hartlepool a few posts back?
Yes he did - I asked him to point us in the direction to view it - still waiting.  Their website hasn't been updated for a while.
I posted a few months ago pointing out the party with a local manifesto was PHF - Labour, LOCAL Conservatives and UKIP were only showing National Manifestos
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: mk1 on January 14, 2017, 04: PM
Beanz is a perfect  example of a 'functioning Illiterate'.
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: Steely Dan on January 15, 2017, 06: AM
Quote from: mk1 on January 14, 2017, 04: PM
Beanz is a perfect  example of a 'functioning Illiterate'.

Haha.

Seriously though, isn't it depressing that such people run the town?
Title: Re: Not just the kremlin then
Post by: Lord Elpus on January 15, 2017, 09: AM
Quote from: Steely Dan on January 15, 2017, 06: AM
Quote from: mk1 on January 14, 2017, 04: PM
Beanz is a perfect  example of a 'functioning Illiterate'.

Haha.

Seriously though, isn't it depressing that such people run the town?

Tom would have a problem running a bath never mind the town