Transport infrastructure.

[Lucy Lass-Tick]

The cross hairs landed on you because maybe in an attempt to build your "cred" in the run up to a local election you rocked up here claiming to "know" about some wrong doing by a clownciller ( AKA waste of oxygen)...offered no evidence

Not true. He provided a link to the evidence and I posted it and the mods deleted it as offensive.

And that was because it WAS offensive. Such material has no place in here. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

[mk1]

And that was because it WAS offensive. Such material has no place in here. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

The claim was Riddle failed to provide evidence. That is not  proven to be a lie. 

[Lucy Lass-Tick]

And that was because it WAS offensive. Such material has no place in here. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

The claim was Riddle failed to provide evidence. That is not  proven to be a lie.

** Sighs ** ... will redefine that to be evidence provided to those who could take real action, rather than just chatter about it?

[mk1]

** Sighs ** ... will redefine that to be evidence provided to those who could take real action, rather than just chatter about it?

The original claim that Riddle failed to provide evidence is a lie. Evidence was provided

[Lucy Lass-Tick]

** Sighs ** ... will redefine that to be evidence provided to those who could take real action, rather than just chatter about it?

The original claim that Riddle failed to provide evidence is a lie. Evidence was provided

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

[mk1]

. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

Perhaps for the same reason this Brexit Party candidate did not report the pigs head incident?
https://youtu.be/OYonssZACZY?t=622

[mk1]

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

How does that change the fact that evidence was provided to back the claim?

[Lucy Lass-Tick]

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

How does that change the fact that evidence was provided to back the claim?

It doesn't - simply explained that someone might be completely unaware of what had been posted. Even admins. can't view deleted posts.

[kevplumb]

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

How does that change the fact that evidence was provided to back the claim?

It doesn't - simply explained that someone might be completely unaware of what had been posted. Even admins. can't view deleted posts.

just s suggestion for the future why not move it to registered only with a warning
then if a member chooses to view it it's up to them
!!

[Lucy Lass-Tick]

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

How does that change the fact that evidence was provided to back the claim?

It doesn't - simply explained that someone might be completely unaware of what had been posted. Even admins. can't view deleted posts.

just s suggestion for the future why not move it to registered only with a warning
then if a member chooses to view it it's up to them
!!

If only that were technically possible ...

[akarjl2]

** Sighs ** ... will redefine that to be evidence provided to those who could take real action, rather than just chatter about it?

The original claim that Riddle failed to provide evidence is a lie. Evidence was provided

Have you ever thought that someone who wasn't permanently glued to the forum might not have seen a deleted post?

Post of the year 

[akarjl2]

. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

Perhaps for the same reason this Brexit Party candidate did not report the pigs head incident?
https://youtu.be/OYonssZACZY?t=622

Same Old news Same old party...same old rant about things that have already happened...helloooooo we have "brexited"

[akarjl2]

And that was because it WAS offensive. Such material has no place in here. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

The claim was Riddle failed to provide evidence. That is not  proven to be a lie.

** Sighs ** ... will redefine that to be evidence provided to those who could take real action, rather than just chatter about it?

Chatter being the operative word....

[Inspector Knacker]

And that was because it WAS offensive. Such material has no place in here. Still doesn't explain why those who did have 'evidence' chose to spread it on social media rather than raise it with the authorities.

The claim was Riddle failed to provide evidence. That is not  proven to be a lie.

A pedantically fussy point as expected.
As someone once pointed out to me, 'It's not how much ammunition you have, it's whether you're prepared to fire the gun at the target. Threatening to pull the trigger is just Windbaggery.'

[Inspector Knacker]

We'll have all this cobblers from the glum club till the May election is over.
Trouble for glum club members is that the the Big Bad Brexit Party have disappeared now, as their target has now been achieved, and if your biggest bogey man disappears what do you do....?
If the present Brexit councillors revert to independent status, a meltdown of Krakatoa proportions will ensue from the glum club....after all, their  Party must win as bragging rights are in desperately short supply for them.