Jackson's Landing

Started by tankerville, March 30, 2013, 04: PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tankerville

With regard to security there is a 24 hour static guard on the building or at least there was, and yes you are quite right the building is near to end of use, the sensible and most cost effective solution would be demolition.

'Maybe' build a Super Casino, do readers remember that?

Drummond's Folly overlooking the empty call centre's from his humble beginnings.

craig finton

I don't see the point of all this. If there was any interest fron private developers then they would have snapped it up by now at the price the council would pay for it. Why would the fact that the council buys it and then acts as a middleman make the slightest difference given that the council seems to be claiming that it expects to  make a profit on the deal. Does this not mean that any developer would have to pay more for it now than they would have had to pay beforehand?
Makes no sense at all to me.

The Great Dictator

Fred C, i said the land BEHIND Tunstall court.

Jacksons landing may be used for council purposes or rented out until the market picks up, either way it is better in our hands and i support it.

mk1

Quote from: The Great Dictator on April 02, 2013, 03: PM
Fred C, i said the land BEHIND Tunstall court.

Jacksons landing may be used for council purposes or rented out until the market picks up, either way it is better in our hands and i support it.

Maybe it could become a  waiting room for the 4 million pound Transport Interchange?