A recurring line

[Inspector Knacker]

about the hospital site and  which pops up in Christophers election blurb in the Mail tonight, is claiming the hospital site is protected so it can only be used for health purposes.
Really ?
The problem is define 'health purposes'.
Is a nursing home ? A sports complex ? A  nice sheltered accommodation  complex ?
Health purposes sounds fine, but saying hospital services would have sounded a lot more reassuring.

[Land Phil]

Look at St Hildas on the headland or Camerons to see what will eventually happen.

No town plan, no protection, especially so since the land was given to the trust.

[Inspector Knacker]

I have no doubt the site will become another twee collection of houses as befits our future role as a backwater dormitory town on the fringes of Greater Middlesbrough.
However, how long are the people who spent most of their time hailing the Wynyard 'vision' now trumpeting their leadership of the campaign to return services that went west on their watch .?

[Hartlepudlion]

So there is some credence to Jean Robinson's (not the Councillor but friend of E. Leck) claim that houses could not be built on the hospital site. She was dismissed and ridiculed as a crank by CAB, a bit ironic seeing his claim now, our MP and the Labour mob. She claimed to have documentary evidence of this but was totally ignored by the Council and Councillors.

I haven't seen her around for quite a while. Anybody seen her lately?

[Alnwickist]

Riggling round the covenant, there is a good case that the covenant can be enforced but it will need to go to court.That's going to need money.