HartlepoolPost Forum

Politics => Local Issues and Matters => Topic started by: testing times on June 26, 2015, 08: PM

Title: This is an apology?
Post by: testing times on June 26, 2015, 08: PM
Public apologies have one thing in common; they are made in public. Can we even be sure Mr Cranney wrote this one or was it delegated to a council officer?

http://www.hartlepool.gov.uk/news/article/5605/statement_issued_by_councillor_kevin_cranney
Title: Re: This is an apology?
Post by: craig finton on June 26, 2015, 09: PM
oh c'mon. Cranney doesn't want to apologise and sees no need why he should. Neither do his mates who have just made him elected Mayor. This is the bare minimum of apologies, the very least that he thinks he could do and still get away with it.
Title: Re: This is an apology?
Post by: fred c on June 27, 2015, 08: AM
What a pathetic apology, it was prabaly written on a sheet of Andrex.
Title: Re: This is an apology?
Post by: steveL on June 27, 2015, 08: AM
Quote from: craig finton on June 26, 2015, 09: PM
oh c'mon. Cranney doesn't want to apologise and sees no need why he should. Neither do his mates who have just made him elected Mayor. This is the bare minimum of apologies, the very least that he thinks he could do and still get away with it.

Just to be picky. He was elected as deputy Mayor
Title: Re: This is an apology?
Post by: for fawkes sake on June 27, 2015, 08: AM
Quote from: craig finton on June 26, 2015, 09: PM
oh c'mon. Cranney doesn't want to apologise and sees no need why he should. Neither do his mates who have just made him elected Mayor. This is the bare minimum of apologies, the very least that he thinks he could do and still get away with it.

I totally agree with the sentiments expressed. This is a begrudged apology from a morally bankrupt man.
Title: Re: This is an apology?
Post by: Lucy Lass-Tick on June 27, 2015, 12: PM
There's nothing like a heartfelt display of remorse to smooth troubled waters - and, lets face it, this is nothing like a heartfelt display of remorse! Surely it's a nominal attempt to do the barest minimum - does anyone else feel it to be an additional insult to the lady in question and (in my opinion) to Peter Devlin, too?